From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx>
commit c0713540f6d55c53dca65baaead55a5a8b20552d upstream.
If all completed requests in io_do_iopoll() were marked with
REQ_F_CQE_SKIP, we'll not only skip CQE posting but also
io_free_batch_list() leaking memory and resources.
Move @nr_events increment before REQ_F_CQE_SKIP check. We'll potentially
return the value greater than the real one, but iopolling will deal with
it and the userspace will re-iopoll if needed. In anyway, I don't think
there are many use cases for REQ_F_CQE_SKIP + IOPOLL.
Fixes: 83a13a4181b0e ("io_uring: tweak iopoll CQE_SKIP event counting")
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5072fc8693fbfd595f89e5d4305bfcfd5d2f0a64.1650186611.git.asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -2612,11 +2612,10 @@ static int io_do_iopoll(struct io_ring_c
/* order with io_complete_rw_iopoll(), e.g. ->result updates */
if (!smp_load_acquire(&req->iopoll_completed))
break;
+ nr_events++;
if (unlikely(req->flags & REQ_F_CQE_SKIP))
continue;
-
__io_fill_cqe(ctx, req->user_data, req->result, io_put_kbuf(req));
- nr_events++;
}
if (unlikely(!nr_events))
