[Public] > -----Original Message----- > From: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, April 22, 2022 07:19 > To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario.Limonciello@xxxxxxx> > Cc: firew4lker <firew4lker@xxxxxxxxx>; Bartosz Golaszewski > <brgl@xxxxxxxx>; Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>; > Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM > <linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; open list <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; > Natikar, Basavaraj <Basavaraj.Natikar@xxxxxxx>; Gong, Richard > <Richard.Gong@xxxxxxx>; stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Greg KH > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Linus Walleij > <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: Request interrupts after IRQ is initialized > > On 21.04.22 18:07, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > On 20.04.22 00:02, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 6:34 AM Mario Limonciello > >> <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >>> Linus Walleij, > >>> > >>> As this is backported to 5.15.y, 5.16.y, 5.17.y and those all had point > >>> releases a bunch of people are hitting it now. If you choose to adopt > >>> this patch instead of revert the broken one, you can add to the commit > >>> message too: > >>> > >>> Link: > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitla > b.freedesktop.org%2Fdrm%2Famd%2F- > %2Fissues%2F1976&data=05%7C01%7Cmario.limonciello%40amd.com% > 7C1bfce4a8186b4b1a4ef208da245a4411%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e > 183d%7C0%7C0%7C637862267399285803%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8ey > JWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D% > 7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=cJvkTifRPkrl8kRaYffMmb0RGkoHb0krYMkj2 > Ufsg5k%3D&reserved=0 > >> > >> I am on parental leave kind of, but Bartosz knows what to do, > >> in this case, since it is ACPI-related, Andy knows best what > >> to do, and I see he also replied. > > > > Bartosz, Andy, what's the status here? It looks like the patch didn't > > make any progress in the past few days (or did I miss it?). I'd really > > like to see this patch or a revert of 5467801f1fcb ("gpio: Restrict > > usage of GPIO chip irq members before initialization") mainlined by rc4, > > so Greg (CCed) can fix it in the next round of stable updates, as it > > seems quite a few people are affected by the problem. > > Mario, are you aware if this patch made any progress towards getting > merged? If not, I wonder if we (you?) maybe should ask Linus to pick > this up directly giving the circumstances to speed things up (or maybe a > v2 that incorporates all the Reviewed-by/ACKs that accumulated). I don't see it in Bartosz or Andy's trees. I'm fine to send up a v2 directly to Linus with this audience on CC. > > Ciao, Thorsten > > > Reminder: this is one of those issue that we IMHO really should fix > > quickly, as explained by a text recently added to the documentation: > > > > > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit.k > ernel.org%2Fpub%2Fscm%2Flinux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux.git% > 2Ftree%2FDocumentation%2Fprocess%2Fhandling- > regressions.rst%23n131&data=05%7C01%7Cmario.limonciello%40amd.c > om%7C1bfce4a8186b4b1a4ef208da245a4411%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d > 994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637862267399285803%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3 > d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0 > %3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ttOhIvDHhi8fIjrpuNcgXKeZaM%2F%2 > BaosUhn2mGEaC67M%3D&reserved=0 > > > > Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) > > > > P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I deal with a lot of > > reports and sometimes miss something important when writing mails like > > this. If that's the case here, don't hesitate to tell me in a public > > reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record straight. > >
