From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 3c69611b8926f8e74fcf76bd97ae0e5dafbeb26a upstream.
In commit 9a69e2b385f4 ("bpf: Make remote_port field in struct
bpf_sk_lookup 16-bit wide") ->remote_port field changed from __u32 to
__be16.
However, narrow load tests which exercise 1-byte sized loads from
offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, remote_port) were not adopted to reflect the
change.
As a result, on little-endian we continue testing loads from addresses:
- (__u8 *)&ctx->remote_port + 3
- (__u8 *)&ctx->remote_port + 4
which map to the zero padding following the remote_port field, and don't
break the tests because there is no observable change.
While on big-endian, we observe breakage because tests expect to see zeros
for values loaded from:
- (__u8 *)&ctx->remote_port - 1
- (__u8 *)&ctx->remote_port - 2
Above addresses map to ->remote_ip6 field, which precedes ->remote_port,
and are populated during the bpf_sk_lookup IPv6 tests.
Unsurprisingly, on s390x we observe:
#136/38 sk_lookup/narrow access to ctx v4:OK
#136/39 sk_lookup/narrow access to ctx v6:FAIL
Fix it by removing the checks for 1-byte loads from offsets outside of the
->remote_port field.
Fixes: 9a69e2b385f4 ("bpf: Make remote_port field in struct bpf_sk_lookup 16-bit wide")
Suggested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220319183356.233666-3-jakub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup.c
@@ -404,8 +404,7 @@ int ctx_narrow_access(struct bpf_sk_look
/* Narrow loads from remote_port field. Expect SRC_PORT. */
if (LSB(ctx->remote_port, 0) != ((SRC_PORT >> 0) & 0xff) ||
- LSB(ctx->remote_port, 1) != ((SRC_PORT >> 8) & 0xff) ||
- LSB(ctx->remote_port, 2) != 0 || LSB(ctx->remote_port, 3) != 0)
+ LSB(ctx->remote_port, 1) != ((SRC_PORT >> 8) & 0xff))
return SK_DROP;
if (LSW(ctx->remote_port, 0) != SRC_PORT)
return SK_DROP;
