Hi Kees, On 4/5/22, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > v3 uses a different check for the -f option, though? Isn't that > preferred over the v2 method? Based on the code comments, I assume this is gcc upstream's intended method. It strikes me as worse, though, because that variable, when it's not set to -1, is set to: `local_tick = (unsigned) tv.tv_sec * 1000 + tv.tv_usec / 1000;` which is on occasion unlucky and hits -1 too. But maybe that's a bug in gcc that should be fixed instead? I don't know really. But anyway that's why I'm /also/ more into that aspect of v2. > Also, I did some quick benchmarking, and any difference in runtime is > completely lost in the noise, so that's good. Oh good to hear. So my 2k buffer is fine then. Jason
