3.13.11.5 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@xxxxxxxx>
commit 22e7478ddbcb670e33fab72d0bbe7c394c3a2c84 upstream.
Prior to commit 0e4f6a791b1e (Fix reiserfs_file_release()), reiserfs
truncates serialized on i_mutex. They mostly still do, with the exception
of reiserfs_file_release. That blocks out other writers via the tailpack
mutex and the inode openers counter adjusted in reiserfs_file_open.
However, NFS will call reiserfs_setattr without having called ->open, so
we end up with a race when nfs is calling ->setattr while another
process is releasing the file. Ultimately, it triggers the
BUG_ON(inode->i_size != new_file_size) check in maybe_indirect_to_direct.
The solution is to pull the lock into reiserfs_setattr to encompass the
truncate_setsize call as well.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/reiserfs/inode.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/inode.c b/fs/reiserfs/inode.c
index ad62bdb..1e4cf9d 100644
--- a/fs/reiserfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/inode.c
@@ -3220,8 +3220,14 @@ int reiserfs_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr)
attr->ia_size != i_size_read(inode)) {
error = inode_newsize_ok(inode, attr->ia_size);
if (!error) {
+ /*
+ * Could race against reiserfs_file_release
+ * if called from NFS, so take tailpack mutex.
+ */
+ mutex_lock(&REISERFS_I(inode)->tailpack);
truncate_setsize(inode, attr->ia_size);
- reiserfs_vfs_truncate_file(inode);
+ reiserfs_truncate_file(inode, 1);
+ mutex_unlock(&REISERFS_I(inode)->tailpack);
}
}
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html