[PATCH 5.17 0272/1126] sched/uclamp: Fix iowait boost escaping uclamp restriction

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@xxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit d37aee9018e68b0d356195caefbb651910e0bbfa ]

iowait_boost signal is applied independently of util and doesn't take
into account uclamp settings of the rq. An io heavy task that is capped
by uclamp_max could still request higher frequency because
sugov_iowait_apply() doesn't clamp the boost via uclamp_rq_util_with()
like effective_cpu_util() does.

Make sure that iowait_boost honours uclamp requests by calling
uclamp_rq_util_with() when applying the boost.

Fixes: 982d9cdc22c9 ("sched/cpufreq, sched/uclamp: Add clamps for FAIR and RT tasks")
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211216225320.2957053-3-qais.yousef@xxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 62d98b09aaa5..6d65ab6e484e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -289,6 +289,7 @@ static void sugov_iowait_apply(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time)
 	 * into the same scale so we can compare.
 	 */
 	boost = (sg_cpu->iowait_boost * sg_cpu->max) >> SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT;
+	boost = uclamp_rq_util_with(cpu_rq(sg_cpu->cpu), boost, NULL);
 	if (sg_cpu->util < boost)
 		sg_cpu->util = boost;
 }
-- 
2.34.1






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux