From: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 15729ff8143f8135b03988a100a19e66d7cb7ecd ]
A crash [1] happened to be triggered in conjunction with commit
2d52c58b9c9b ("block, bfq: honor already-setup queue merges"). The
latter was then reverted by commit ebc69e897e17 ("Revert "block, bfq:
honor already-setup queue merges""). Yet, the reverted commit was not
the one introducing the bug. In fact, it actually triggered a UAF
introduced by a different commit, and now fixed by commit d29bd41428cf
("block, bfq: reset last_bfqq_created on group change").
So, there is no point in keeping commit 2d52c58b9c9b ("block, bfq:
honor already-setup queue merges") out. This commit restores it.
[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214503
Reported-by: Holger Hoffstätte <holger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211125181510.15004-1-paolo.valente@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
block/bfq-iosched.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index dfd55037dc6f..a9f42df92ea3 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -2155,6 +2155,15 @@ bfq_setup_merge(struct bfq_queue *bfqq, struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq)
* are likely to increase the throughput.
*/
bfqq->new_bfqq = new_bfqq;
+ /*
+ * The above assignment schedules the following redirections:
+ * each time some I/O for bfqq arrives, the process that
+ * generated that I/O is disassociated from bfqq and
+ * associated with new_bfqq. Here we increases new_bfqq->ref
+ * in advance, adding the number of processes that are
+ * expected to be associated with new_bfqq as they happen to
+ * issue I/O.
+ */
new_bfqq->ref += process_refs;
return new_bfqq;
}
@@ -2214,6 +2223,10 @@ bfq_setup_cooperator(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
{
struct bfq_queue *in_service_bfqq, *new_bfqq;
+ /* if a merge has already been setup, then proceed with that first */
+ if (bfqq->new_bfqq)
+ return bfqq->new_bfqq;
+
/*
* Prevent bfqq from being merged if it has been created too
* long ago. The idea is that true cooperating processes, and
@@ -2228,9 +2241,6 @@ bfq_setup_cooperator(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
if (bfq_too_late_for_merging(bfqq))
return NULL;
- if (bfqq->new_bfqq)
- return bfqq->new_bfqq;
-
if (!io_struct || unlikely(bfqq == &bfqd->oom_bfqq))
return NULL;
--
2.34.1
