On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 07:02:16PM +0100, Halil Pasic wrote: > > If > > ddbd89deb7d3 alone turns out to work OK then I'd be inclined to try a > > partial revert of just that one hunk. > > > > I'm not against being pragmatic and doing the partial revert. But as > explained above, I do believe for correctness of swiotlb we ultimately > do need that change. So if the revert is the short term solution, > what should be our mid-term road-map? Unless I'm misunderstanding this thread we found the bug in ath9k and have a fix for that now?
