Hi Thorsten, regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on Mon, 21 Mar 2022 12:48:11 +0100: > On 16.03.22 16:54, Tokunori Ikegami wrote: > > As pointed out by this bug report [1], buffered writes are now broken on > > S29GL064N. This issue comes from a rework which switched from using chip_good() > > to chip_ready(), because DQ true data 0xFF is read on S29GL064N and an error > > returned by chip_good(). One way to solve the issue is to revert the change > > partially to use chip_ready for S29GL064N. > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/b687c259-6413-26c9-d4c9-b3afa69ea124@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > Why did you switch from the documented format for links you added on my > request (see > https://lore.kernel.org/stable/f1b44e87-e457-7783-d46e-0d577cea3b72@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > ) to v2 to something else that is not recognized by tools and scripts > that rely on proper link tags? You are making my and maybe other peoples > life unnecessary hard. :-(( > > FWIW, the proper style should support footnote style like this: > > Link: > https://lore.kernel.org/r/b687c259-6413-26c9-d4c9-b3afa69ea124@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > [1] > > Ciao, Thorsten > > #regzbot ^backmonitor: > https://lore.kernel.org/r/b687c259-6413-26c9-d4c9-b3afa69ea124@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > Because today's requirement from maintainers is to provide a Link tag that points to the mail discussion of the patch being applied. I then asked to use the above form instead to point to the bug report because I don't see the point of having a "Link" tag for it? Thanks, Miquèl
