On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 11:41:07AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 06:23:53PM +0000, James Morse wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > Here is the state of the current v5.4 backport. Now that the 32bit > > code has been merged, it doesn't conflict when KVM's shared 32bit/64bit > > code needs to use these constants. > > > > I've fixed the two issues that were reported against the v5.10 backport. > > > > I had a go at bringing all the pre-requisites in to add proton-pack.c > > to v5.4. Its currently 39 patches: > > https://git.gitlab.arm.com/linux-arm/linux-jm.git /bhb/alternative_backport/UNTESTED/v5.4.183 > > (or for web browsers: > > https://gitlab.arm.com/linux-arm/linux-jm/-/commits/bhb/alternative_backport/UNTESTED/v5.4.183/ > > ) > > I've queued it up. Thanks for merging these, and James, thanks for the backports! I agree, this way is a bit "simpler", but thanks for trying the other way as well. Does this mean that the 4.19 and older backports will be easier? greg k-h
