On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 12:19:41PM +0100, Michal Koutný wrote:
> Hello.
>
> In my opinion there are two approaches:
> a) drop this backport (given other races present),
I have no problem with that, want to send a revert patch?
> b) swap the locks compatible with v4.19 as this patch proposes.
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 05:11:50PM +0800, Zhang Qiao <zhangqiao22@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > + /*
> > + * It should hold cpus lock because a cpu offline event can
> > + * cause set_cpus_allowed_ptr() failed.
> > + */
> > + cpus_read_lock();
>
> Maybe just a nit, the old kernels before commit c5c63b9a6a2e ("cgroup:
> Replace deprecated CPU-hotplug functions.") v5.15-rc1~159^2~5
> would be more consistent with get_online_cpus() here (but they're
> equivalent functionally so the locking order is correct).
A fixed up patch would also be appreciated :)
thanks,
greg k-h
