On 3/3/22 9:07 AM, Ammar Faizi wrote:
On 3/3/22 8:58 AM, Alviro Iskandar Setiawan wrote:
hi sir, i think this can be improved again, we can avoid calling
this_cpu_read(mce_num_banks) twice if we pass the numbanks as an
argument, plz review the changes below
OK, nice improvement. I will fold this in...
It looks like this now. Yazen, Alviro, please review the
following patch. If you think it looks good, I will submit
it for the v5.
From 91a447f837d502b7a040cd68f333fb98f4b941d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 09:22:17 +0700
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/2] x86/MCE/AMD: Fix memory leak when `threshold_create_bank()` fails
In mce_threshold_create_device(), if threshold_create_bank() fails, the
@bp will be leaked, because mce_threshold_remove_device() will not free
the @bp. It only frees the @bp when we've already written the @bp to
the @threshold_banks per-CPU variable, but at the point, we haven't.
Fix this by extracting the cleanup part into a new static function
_mce_threshold_remove_device(), then use it from create/remove device
function. Also, eliminate the "goto out_err". Just early return inside
the loop if we fail.
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v5.8+
Fixes: 6458de97fc15 ("x86/mce/amd: Straighten CPU hotplug path")
Co-authored-by: Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <alviro.iskandar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <alviro.iskandar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Co-authored-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c
index 9f4b508886dd..e492efab68a2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c
@@ -1293,10 +1293,23 @@ static void threshold_remove_bank(struct threshold_bank *bank)
kfree(bank);
}
+static void _mce_threshold_remove_device(struct threshold_bank **bp,
+ unsigned int numbanks)
+{
+ unsigned int bank;
+
+ for (bank = 0; bank < numbanks; bank++) {
+ if (bp[bank]) {
+ threshold_remove_bank(bp[bank]);
+ bp[bank] = NULL;
+ }
+ }
+ kfree(bp);
+}
+
int mce_threshold_remove_device(unsigned int cpu)
{
struct threshold_bank **bp = this_cpu_read(threshold_banks);
- unsigned int bank, numbanks = this_cpu_read(mce_num_banks);
if (!bp)
return 0;
@@ -1307,13 +1320,7 @@ int mce_threshold_remove_device(unsigned int cpu)
*/
this_cpu_write(threshold_banks, NULL);
- for (bank = 0; bank < numbanks; bank++) {
- if (bp[bank]) {
- threshold_remove_bank(bp[bank]);
- bp[bank] = NULL;
- }
- }
- kfree(bp);
+ _mce_threshold_remove_device(bp, this_cpu_read(mce_num_banks));
return 0;
}
@@ -1350,15 +1357,14 @@ int mce_threshold_create_device(unsigned int cpu)
if (!(this_cpu_read(bank_map) & (1 << bank)))
continue;
err = threshold_create_bank(bp, cpu, bank);
- if (err)
- goto out_err;
+ if (err) {
+ _mce_threshold_remove_device(bp, numbanks);
+ return err;
+ }
}
this_cpu_write(threshold_banks, bp);
if (thresholding_irq_en)
mce_threshold_vector = amd_threshold_interrupt;
return 0;
-out_err:
- mce_threshold_remove_device(cpu);
- return err;
}
--
Ammar Faizi
