[PATCH 5.16 153/164] hugetlbfs: fix a truncation issue in hugepages parameter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Liu Yuntao <liuyuntao10@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit e79ce9832316e09529b212a21278d68240ccbf1f upstream.

When we specify a large number for node in hugepages parameter, it may
be parsed to another number due to truncation in this statement:

	node = tmp;

For example, add following parameter in command line:

	hugepagesz=1G hugepages=4294967297:5

and kernel will allocate 5 hugepages for node 1 instead of ignoring it.

I move the validation check earlier to fix this issue, and slightly
simplifies the condition here.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220209134018.8242-1-liuyuntao10@xxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: b5389086ad7be0 ("hugetlbfs: extend the definition of hugepages parameter to support node allocation")
Signed-off-by: Liu Yuntao <liuyuntao10@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 mm/hugetlb.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index e57650a9404f..f294db835f4b 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -4159,10 +4159,10 @@ static int __init hugepages_setup(char *s)
 				pr_warn("HugeTLB: architecture can't support node specific alloc, ignoring!\n");
 				return 0;
 			}
+			if (tmp >= nr_online_nodes)
+				goto invalid;
 			node = tmp;
 			p += count + 1;
-			if (node < 0 || node >= nr_online_nodes)
-				goto invalid;
 			/* Parse hugepages */
 			if (sscanf(p, "%lu%n", &tmp, &count) != 1)
 				goto invalid;
-- 
2.35.1






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux