On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 02:04:23PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 03:31:58PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 01:34:27PM +0100, Max Kellermann wrote: > > > Its value is calculated in sun4i_pwm_apply() and is used only there. > > > > > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > I think I'd drop this. This isn't a fix worth on it's own to be > > backported and if this is needed for one of the next patches, the stable > > maintainers will notice themselves (and it might be worth to shuffle > > this series to make the fixes come first). > > > > > Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Other than that, LGTM: > > > > Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Does that apply to patches 2 & 3 as well? No, at that time I only looked at patch 1. I just looked at 2 and 3 and will reply to them individually. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature