Re: [PATCH 4.19 29/58] bonding: fix data-races around agg_select_timer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> syzbot reported that two threads might write over agg_select_timer
> at the same time. Make agg_select_timer atomic to fix the races.

Ok, but:

> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
> @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static inline int __check_agg_selection_
>  	if (bond == NULL)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	return BOND_AD_INFO(bond).agg_select_timer ? 1 : 0;
> +	return atomic_read(&BOND_AD_INFO(bond).agg_select_timer) ? 1 : 0;
>  }

This could probably use !!.

> +static bool bond_agg_timer_advance(struct bonding *bond)
> +{
> +	int val, nval;
> +
> +	while (1) {
> +		val = atomic_read(&BOND_AD_INFO(bond).agg_select_timer);
> +		if (!val)
> +			return false;
> +		nval = val - 1;
> +		if (atomic_cmpxchg(&BOND_AD_INFO(bond).agg_select_timer,
> +				   val, nval) == val)
> +			break;
> +	}
> +	return nval == 0;
> +}

This should really be atomic_dec_if_positive, no?

Best regards,
								Pavel
-- 
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux