On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 11:22:39 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 21:33:19 +0300 Serge Semin wrote: > > > I see it's marked as Superseded in patchwork, but can't track down a v3. > > > > We had accidentally sent out a temporal v2 version before submitting this > > one. The failed patch is here > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20220205190814.20282-1-Pavel.Parkhomenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > But the message was sent to Russel and to the stable mailing list only > > with no netdev list being in Cc. I thought if the right v2 was sent > > out after the failed one, then even if patchwork somehow gets to catch > > both of the messages, the former patch would have at least superseded > > the later one. It appears I was wrong. Sorry about that. Do you want > > us to resend this patch as v3 to have a proper patchwork status? > > No need, I set it back to New, thanks! Applied now, commit fe4f57bf7b58 ("net: phy: marvell: Fix RGMII Tx/Rx delays setting in 88e1121-compatible PHYs"), thanks!
