[PATCH 1/2] drm/i195: Fix dbuf slice config lookup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Apparently I totally fumbled the loop condition when I
removed the ARRAY_SIZE() stuff from the dbuf slice config
lookup. Comparing the loop index with the active_pipes bitmask
is utter nonsense, what we want to do is check to see if the
mask is zero or not.

Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 05e8155afe35 ("drm/i915: Use a sentinel to terminate the dbuf slice arrays")
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 02084652fe3d..da721aea70ff 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -4848,7 +4848,7 @@ static u8 compute_dbuf_slices(enum pipe pipe, u8 active_pipes, bool join_mbus,
 {
 	int i;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < dbuf_slices[i].active_pipes; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; dbuf_slices[i].active_pipes != 0; i++) {
 		if (dbuf_slices[i].active_pipes == active_pipes &&
 		    dbuf_slices[i].join_mbus == join_mbus)
 			return dbuf_slices[i].dbuf_mask[pipe];
-- 
2.34.1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux