Hi Greg, Add Takashi Iwai to this thread. At Sat, 05 Jul 2014 16:00:41 +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > > At Fri, 04 Jul 2014 22:45:42 -0700, > Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > On 07/04/2014 03:18 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.14.11 release. > > > There are 59 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > let me know. > > > > > > Responses should be made by Sun Jul 6 22:15:27 UTC 2014. > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > Build results: > > total: 144 pass: 130 skipped: 4 fail: 10 > > Failed builds: > > alpha:allmodconfig > > i386:allyesconfig > > i386:allmodconfig > > powerpc:allmodconfig (binutils 2.23) > > powerpc:allmodconfig (binutils 2.24) > > sparc64:allmodconfig > > unicore32:defconfig > > x86_64:allyesconfig > > x86_64:allmodconfig > > xtensa:allmodconfig > > > > Qemu test for x86 failed. > > > > Build error is the same as seen with 3.14. > > > > sound/pci/hda/patch_sigmatel.c: In function 'stac92hd95_fixup_hp_led': > > sound/pci/hda/patch_sigmatel.c:4143:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'codec_dbg' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > This kernel failed to build with the following error. Probably the root > cause is the same as Guenter. I'm now bisecting to find the problematic > patch... The following patch caused the boot failure of both this kernel and 3.10.47-rc1. alsa-hda-adjust-speaker-hpf-and-add-led-support-for-hp-spectre-13.patch: =============================================================================== >From 8b3dfdaf0c25a584cb31d04d2574115cf2d422ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 13:55:25 +0200 Subject: ALSA: hda - Adjust speaker HPF and add LED support for HP Spectre 13 From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> commit 8b3dfdaf0c25a584cb31d04d2574115cf2d422ab upstream. HP Spectre 13 has the IDT 92HD95 codec, and BIOS seems to set the default high-pass filter in some "safer" range, which results in the very soft tone from the built-in speakers in contrast to Windows. Also, the mute LED control is missing, since 92HD95 codec still has no HP-specific fixups for GPIO setups. This patch adds these missing features: the HPF is adjusted by the vendor-specific verb, and the LED is set up from a DMI string (but with the default polarity = 0 assumption due to the incomplete BIOS on the given machine). Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74841 Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ... =============================================================================== This patch uses codec_dbg(), however, this macro is intrdocuded by the following patch and it's not applied to these stable-tree yet. =============================================================================== ommit 4e76a8833fac8dc1735aa5be7d1b3c92c65e209e Author: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> Date: Tue Feb 25 12:21:03 2014 +0100 ALSA: hda - Replace with standard printk Use dev_err() and co for messages from HD-audio controller and codec drivers. The codec drivers are mostly bound with codec objects, so some helper macros, codec_err(), codec_info(), etc, are provided. They merely wrap the corresponding dev_xxx(). There are a few places still calling snd_printk() and its variants as they are called without the codec or device context. Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> ... =============================================================================== Unfortunately I failed to apply this patch to 3.14.11-rc1 with the following error log. =============================================================================== $ git apply ~/src/test-linux-stable/extra_patch.txt error: patch failed: sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c:897 error: sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c: patch does not apply error: sound/pci/hda/hda_sysfs.c: No such file or directory =============================================================================== I'm not sure whether we should drop this patch or should apply extra patches to remove this build failure. Any idea? Thanks, Satoru > > =============================================================================== > ... > home/sat/src/test-linux-stable/linux-stable/sound/pci/hda/patch_sigmatel.c:4143:3: error: implicit declaration of function ʽcodec_dbgʼ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > codec_dbg(codec, "mute LED gpio %d polarity %d\n", > ^ > LD [M] sound/pci/echoaudio/snd-indigoio.o > LD [M] sound/pci/echoaudio/snd-indigodj.o > LD [M] sound/pci/echoaudio/snd-indigoiox.o > LD [M] sound/pci/echoaudio/snd-indigodjx.o > CC [M] sound/pci/hda/patch_via.o > LD sound/pci/ice1712/built-in.o > CC [M] sound/pci/ice1712/ice1712.o > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > /home/sat/src/test-linux-stable/linux-stable/scripts/Makefile.build:308: recipe for target 'sound/pci/hda/patch_sigmatel.o' failed > make[4]: *** [sound/pci/hda/patch_sigmatel.o] Error 1 > ... > CC drivers/iommu/irq_remapping.o > /home/sat/src/test-linux-stable/linux-stable/scripts/Makefile.build:455: recipe for target 'sound/pci/hda' failed > make[3]: *** [sound/pci/hda] Error 2 > ... > /home/sat/src/test-linux-stable/linux-stable/scripts/Makefile.build:455: recipe for target 'sound/pci' failed > make[2]: *** [sound/pci] Error 2 > /home/sat/src/test-linux-stable/linux-stable/Makefile:841: recipe for target 'sound' failed > make[1]: *** [sound] Error 2 > ... > Makefile:133: recipe for target 'sub-make' failed > make: *** [sub-make] Error 2 > FAILED! > CRITICAL FAILURE... failed build > ... > =============================================================================== > > - Test Cases: > - Build this kernel. > - Boot this kernel. > - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. > > - Test Tool: > https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable > > - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log): > http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/<version>-<test datetime>.tar.xz > > - Build Environment: > - OS: Debian Jessy x86_64 > - CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 4 > - memory: 8GB > > - Test Target Environment: > - Debian Jessy x86_64 (KVM guest on the Build Environment) > - # of vCPU: 2 > - memory: 2GB > > Thanks, > Satoru > > > > > > Guenter > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html