On Fri 2022-02-04 10:40:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 10:37:35AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > commit ef54c1a476aef7eef26fe13ea10dc090952c00f8 upstream.
> > >
> > > Make perf_event_exit_event() more robust, such that we can use it from
> > > other contexts. Specifically the up and coming remove_on_exec.
> >
> > Do we need this in 5.10? AFAICT the remove_on_exec work is not queued
> > for 5.10, and this patch is buggy and needs following one to fix it
> > up.
>
> It's needed by the following patch, which says 5.10 is affected.
9/25 says this patch broke 5.10: Fixes: ef54c1a476ae ("perf: Rework
perf_event_exit_event()"). 8/25 is not claiming to fix anything.
Simply drop 8/25 and 9/25, and 5.10 is okay...
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
