On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 11:11:47PM -0600, Daniel Díaz wrote: > Hello! > > We didn't get the notification for this release candidate. Thanks for the heads up, Guenter! Yes, as I responded to Guenter, no one did, that was a bug in my scripts due to the size of this series :( > On 1/25/22 10:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.3 release. > > There are 1033 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 27 Jan 2022 15:52:30 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.3-rc2.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > Results from Linaro's test farm. > No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. > > ## Build > * kernel: 5.16.3-rc2 > * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc > * git branch: linux-5.16.y > * git commit: 39cb7e05eaf4fd55c6445fe8fe9ffa7f8d329205 > * git describe: v5.16.2-1034-g39cb7e05eaf4 > * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.16.y/build/v5.16.2-1034-g39cb7e05eaf4 > > ## No test Regressions (compared to v5.16.2) > > ## No metric Regressions (compared to v5.16.2) > > ## No test Fixes (compared to v5.16.2) > > ## No metric Fixes (compared to v5.16.2) > > ## Test result summary > total: 105828, pass: 89914, fail: 1186, skip: 13585, xfail: 1143 > > ## Build Summary > * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed > * arm: 263 total, 261 passed, 2 failed > * arm64: 42 total, 42 passed, 0 failed > * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed > * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed > * i386: 40 total, 37 passed, 3 failed > * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed > * mips: 37 total, 35 passed, 2 failed > * parisc: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed > * powerpc: 56 total, 50 passed, 6 failed > * riscv: 28 total, 24 passed, 4 failed > * s390: 22 total, 20 passed, 2 failed > * sh: 26 total, 24 passed, 2 failed > * sparc: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed > * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed > * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed > * x86_64: 42 total, 42 passed, 0 failed <snip> No Tested-by: line?
