On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 06:54:05AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > On Wed, 2014-07-02 at 23:05 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 03:52:35PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > > > In which case it's not marked for stable backport ... I assume it should > > > be? > > > > Only if the patch that regression went to stable, which it shouldn't, > > Well it did: > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/commit/drivers/scsi?h=linux-3.15.y&id=04423ddea30a7fb7232636eda8aed55ea5b972fe > > The stable process is a bit broken from my point of view since it > doesn't copy linux-scsi on SCSI commits I copy everyone on the patch. You were not on that patch as it doesn't look like it went through your tree at all. > ... but this time even I didn't get a cc, so really no-one who knew > there was a problem had a chance to comment. The target people (Nicholas) asked for the patch to be applied, they knew what was going on here. > The choice is either request revert from stable or add fix. Agreed, just let me know. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html