On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 09:15:51AM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Tue, 25 Jan 2022 07:48:39 +0900 > Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > > > Hi Greg, > > > > On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:41:57 +0100, > > Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > [ Upstream commit 87d6576ddf8ac25f36597bc93ca17f6628289c16 ] > > > > > > The name of the package with ctexhook.sty is different on > > > Debian/Ubuntu. > > > > > > Reported-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Tested-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/63882425609a2820fac78f5e94620abeb7ed5f6f.1641429634.git.mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx > > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > This "Fix" is against upstream commit 7baab965896e ("scripts: > > sphinx-pre-install: add required ctex dependency") which is > > also new to v5.17-rc1. > > > > So I don't think this is worth backporting to stable branches. > > Well, either both patches should be backported or none, IMHO. > I guess I would just backport also commit 7baab965896e. Ok, in looking at that report, it makes sense, I'll add both of these now. thanks, greg k-h
