From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit e60b0d12a95dcf16a63225cead4541567f5cb517 ]
If we ever get to a point again where we convert a bogus looking <ptr>_or_null
typed register containing a non-zero fixed or variable offset, then lets not
reset these bounds to zero since they are not and also don't promote the register
to a <ptr> type, but instead leave it as <ptr>_or_null. Converting to a unknown
register could be an avenue as well, but then if we run into this case it would
allow to leak a kernel pointer this way.
Fixes: f1174f77b50c ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index c623c3e549210..015bf2ba4a0b6 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -7725,15 +7725,15 @@ static void mark_ptr_or_null_reg(struct bpf_func_state *state,
{
if (reg_type_may_be_null(reg->type) && reg->id == id &&
!WARN_ON_ONCE(!reg->id)) {
- /* Old offset (both fixed and variable parts) should
- * have been known-zero, because we don't allow pointer
- * arithmetic on pointers that might be NULL.
- */
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(reg->smin_value || reg->smax_value ||
!tnum_equals_const(reg->var_off, 0) ||
reg->off)) {
- __mark_reg_known_zero(reg);
- reg->off = 0;
+ /* Old offset (both fixed and variable parts) should
+ * have been known-zero, because we don't allow pointer
+ * arithmetic on pointers that might be NULL. If we
+ * see this happening, don't convert the register.
+ */
+ return;
}
if (is_null) {
reg->type = SCALAR_VALUE;
--
2.34.1
