----- On Jan 24, 2022, at 2:42 AM, Linus Torvalds torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 9:32 PM Mathieu Desnoyers
> <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> The rseq rseq_cs.ptr.{ptr32,padding} uapi endianness handling is
>> entirely wrong on 32-bit little endian: a preprocessor logic mistake
>> wrongly uses the big endian field layout on 32-bit little endian
>> architectures.
>>
>> Fortunately, those ptr32 accessors were never used within the kernel,
>> and only meant as a convenience for user-space.
>
> Please don't double down on something that was already broken once.
>
> Just remove the broken 32-bit one entirely that the kernel doesn't
> even use, and make everybody use
>
> __u64 ptr64;
>
> and be done with it.
OK, should I just leave:
struct rseq {
[...]
union rseq_cs {
__u64 ptr64;
} rseq_cs;
[...]
};
and remove all the other content from the union, so users of
rseq_abi->rseq_cs.ptr64 will continue to work as-is with either
old and new headers ? This keeps a union in place with a single
element, so I just want to confirm with you that is what you
have in mind.
It does make tons of sense to just remove the broken convenience
code and let user-space handle this based on the ptr64 field, so
it will work fine with old and new headers.
Thanks for your feedback, and travel safe!
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
