Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/memory-failure.c: support use of a dedicated thread to" failed to apply to 3.10-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> The patch below does not apply to the 3.10-stable tree.
> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
> 

In my check, this patch is cleanly applied on top of 3.10.45 + commit
74614de17db6 ("mm/memory-failure.c: don't let collect_procs() skip
over processes for MF_ACTION_REQUIRED").
There might have been a conflict with other patches newly backported
to stable. Could you show me how you failed to apply?

Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi


> ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
> 
> From 3ba08129e38437561df44c36b7ea9081185d5333 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 16:11:02 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] mm/memory-failure.c: support use of a dedicated thread to
>  handle SIGBUS(BUS_MCEERR_AO)
> 
> Currently memory error handler handles action optional errors in the
> deferred manner by default.  And if a recovery aware application wants
> to handle it immediately, it can do it by setting PF_MCE_EARLY flag.
> However, such signal can be sent only to the main thread, so it's
> problematic if the application wants to have a dedicated thread to
> handler such signals.
> 
> So this patch adds dedicated thread support to memory error handler.  We
> have PF_MCE_EARLY flags for each thread separately, so with this patch
> AO signal is sent to the thread with PF_MCE_EARLY flag set, not the main
> thread.  If you want to implement a dedicated thread, you call prctl()
> to set PF_MCE_EARLY on the thread.
> 
> Memory error handler collects processes to be killed, so this patch lets
> it check PF_MCE_EARLY flag on each thread in the collecting routines.
> 
> No behavioral change for all non-early kill cases.
> 
> Tony said:
> 
> : The old behavior was crazy - someone with a multithreaded process might
> : well expect that if they call prctl(PF_MCE_EARLY) in just one thread, then
> : that thread would see the SIGBUS with si_code = BUS_MCEERR_A0 - even if
> : that thread wasn't the main thread for the process.
> 
> [akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: coding-style fixes]
> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Kamil Iskra <iskra@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Chen Gong <gong.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>	[3.2+]
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/vm/hwpoison.txt b/Documentation/vm/hwpoison.txt
> index 550068466605..6ae89a9edf2a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/vm/hwpoison.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/vm/hwpoison.txt
> @@ -84,6 +84,11 @@ PR_MCE_KILL
>  		PR_MCE_KILL_EARLY: Early kill
>  		PR_MCE_KILL_LATE:  Late kill
>  		PR_MCE_KILL_DEFAULT: Use system global default
> +	Note that if you want to have a dedicated thread which handles
> +	the SIGBUS(BUS_MCEERR_AO) on behalf of the process, you should
> +	call prctl(PR_MCE_KILL_EARLY) on the designated thread. Otherwise,
> +	the SIGBUS is sent to the main thread.
> +
>  PR_MCE_KILL_GET
>  	return current mode
>  
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index ed339c505d55..cd8989c1027e 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -380,15 +380,44 @@ static void kill_procs(struct list_head *to_kill, int forcekill, int trapno,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static int task_early_kill(struct task_struct *tsk, int force_early)
> +/*
> + * Find a dedicated thread which is supposed to handle SIGBUS(BUS_MCEERR_AO)
> + * on behalf of the thread group. Return task_struct of the (first found)
> + * dedicated thread if found, and return NULL otherwise.
> + *
> + * We already hold read_lock(&tasklist_lock) in the caller, so we don't
> + * have to call rcu_read_lock/unlock() in this function.
> + */
> +static struct task_struct *find_early_kill_thread(struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> +	struct task_struct *t;
> +
> +	for_each_thread(tsk, t)
> +		if ((t->flags & PF_MCE_PROCESS) && (t->flags & PF_MCE_EARLY))
> +			return t;
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Determine whether a given process is "early kill" process which expects
> + * to be signaled when some page under the process is hwpoisoned.
> + * Return task_struct of the dedicated thread (main thread unless explicitly
> + * specified) if the process is "early kill," and otherwise returns NULL.
> + */
> +static struct task_struct *task_early_kill(struct task_struct *tsk,
> +					   int force_early)
>  {
> +	struct task_struct *t;
>  	if (!tsk->mm)
> -		return 0;
> +		return NULL;
>  	if (force_early)
> -		return 1;
> -	if (tsk->flags & PF_MCE_PROCESS)
> -		return !!(tsk->flags & PF_MCE_EARLY);
> -	return sysctl_memory_failure_early_kill;
> +		return tsk;
> +	t = find_early_kill_thread(tsk);
> +	if (t)
> +		return t;
> +	if (sysctl_memory_failure_early_kill)
> +		return tsk;
> +	return NULL;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -410,16 +439,17 @@ static void collect_procs_anon(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
>  	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
>  	for_each_process (tsk) {
>  		struct anon_vma_chain *vmac;
> +		struct task_struct *t = task_early_kill(tsk, force_early);
>  
> -		if (!task_early_kill(tsk, force_early))
> +		if (!t)
>  			continue;
>  		anon_vma_interval_tree_foreach(vmac, &av->rb_root,
>  					       pgoff, pgoff) {
>  			vma = vmac->vma;
>  			if (!page_mapped_in_vma(page, vma))
>  				continue;
> -			if (vma->vm_mm == tsk->mm)
> -				add_to_kill(tsk, page, vma, to_kill, tkc);
> +			if (vma->vm_mm == t->mm)
> +				add_to_kill(t, page, vma, to_kill, tkc);
>  		}
>  	}
>  	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> @@ -440,10 +470,10 @@ static void collect_procs_file(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
>  	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
>  	for_each_process(tsk) {
>  		pgoff_t pgoff = page->index << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT);
> +		struct task_struct *t = task_early_kill(tsk, force_early);
>  
> -		if (!task_early_kill(tsk, force_early))
> +		if (!t)
>  			continue;
> -
>  		vma_interval_tree_foreach(vma, &mapping->i_mmap, pgoff,
>  				      pgoff) {
>  			/*
> @@ -453,8 +483,8 @@ static void collect_procs_file(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
>  			 * Assume applications who requested early kill want
>  			 * to be informed of all such data corruptions.
>  			 */
> -			if (vma->vm_mm == tsk->mm)
> -				add_to_kill(tsk, page, vma, to_kill, tkc);
> +			if (vma->vm_mm == t->mm)
> +				add_to_kill(t, page, vma, to_kill, tkc);
>  		}
>  	}
>  	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);


On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:16:20AM -0500, Horiguchi, Naoya wrote:
> The patch below does not apply to the 3.10-stable tree.
> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
> ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
> 
> From 3ba08129e38437561df44c36b7ea9081185d5333 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 16:11:02 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] mm/memory-failure.c: support use of a dedicated thread to
>  handle SIGBUS(BUS_MCEERR_AO)
> 
> Currently memory error handler handles action optional errors in the
> deferred manner by default.  And if a recovery aware application wants
> to handle it immediately, it can do it by setting PF_MCE_EARLY flag.
> However, such signal can be sent only to the main thread, so it's
> problematic if the application wants to have a dedicated thread to
> handler such signals.
> 
> So this patch adds dedicated thread support to memory error handler.  We
> have PF_MCE_EARLY flags for each thread separately, so with this patch
> AO signal is sent to the thread with PF_MCE_EARLY flag set, not the main
> thread.  If you want to implement a dedicated thread, you call prctl()
> to set PF_MCE_EARLY on the thread.
> 
> Memory error handler collects processes to be killed, so this patch lets
> it check PF_MCE_EARLY flag on each thread in the collecting routines.
> 
> No behavioral change for all non-early kill cases.
> 
> Tony said:
> 
> : The old behavior was crazy - someone with a multithreaded process might
> : well expect that if they call prctl(PF_MCE_EARLY) in just one thread, then
> : that thread would see the SIGBUS with si_code = BUS_MCEERR_A0 - even if
> : that thread wasn't the main thread for the process.
> 
> [akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: coding-style fixes]
> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Kamil Iskra <iskra@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Chen Gong <gong.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>	[3.2+]
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/vm/hwpoison.txt b/Documentation/vm/hwpoison.txt
> index 550068466605..6ae89a9edf2a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/vm/hwpoison.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/vm/hwpoison.txt
> @@ -84,6 +84,11 @@ PR_MCE_KILL
>  		PR_MCE_KILL_EARLY: Early kill
>  		PR_MCE_KILL_LATE:  Late kill
>  		PR_MCE_KILL_DEFAULT: Use system global default
> +	Note that if you want to have a dedicated thread which handles
> +	the SIGBUS(BUS_MCEERR_AO) on behalf of the process, you should
> +	call prctl(PR_MCE_KILL_EARLY) on the designated thread. Otherwise,
> +	the SIGBUS is sent to the main thread.
> +
>  PR_MCE_KILL_GET
>  	return current mode
>  
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index ed339c505d55..cd8989c1027e 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -380,15 +380,44 @@ static void kill_procs(struct list_head *to_kill, int forcekill, int trapno,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static int task_early_kill(struct task_struct *tsk, int force_early)
> +/*
> + * Find a dedicated thread which is supposed to handle SIGBUS(BUS_MCEERR_AO)
> + * on behalf of the thread group. Return task_struct of the (first found)
> + * dedicated thread if found, and return NULL otherwise.
> + *
> + * We already hold read_lock(&tasklist_lock) in the caller, so we don't
> + * have to call rcu_read_lock/unlock() in this function.
> + */
> +static struct task_struct *find_early_kill_thread(struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> +	struct task_struct *t;
> +
> +	for_each_thread(tsk, t)
> +		if ((t->flags & PF_MCE_PROCESS) && (t->flags & PF_MCE_EARLY))
> +			return t;
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Determine whether a given process is "early kill" process which expects
> + * to be signaled when some page under the process is hwpoisoned.
> + * Return task_struct of the dedicated thread (main thread unless explicitly
> + * specified) if the process is "early kill," and otherwise returns NULL.
> + */
> +static struct task_struct *task_early_kill(struct task_struct *tsk,
> +					   int force_early)
>  {
> +	struct task_struct *t;
>  	if (!tsk->mm)
> -		return 0;
> +		return NULL;
>  	if (force_early)
> -		return 1;
> -	if (tsk->flags & PF_MCE_PROCESS)
> -		return !!(tsk->flags & PF_MCE_EARLY);
> -	return sysctl_memory_failure_early_kill;
> +		return tsk;
> +	t = find_early_kill_thread(tsk);
> +	if (t)
> +		return t;
> +	if (sysctl_memory_failure_early_kill)
> +		return tsk;
> +	return NULL;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -410,16 +439,17 @@ static void collect_procs_anon(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
>  	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
>  	for_each_process (tsk) {
>  		struct anon_vma_chain *vmac;
> +		struct task_struct *t = task_early_kill(tsk, force_early);
>  
> -		if (!task_early_kill(tsk, force_early))
> +		if (!t)
>  			continue;
>  		anon_vma_interval_tree_foreach(vmac, &av->rb_root,
>  					       pgoff, pgoff) {
>  			vma = vmac->vma;
>  			if (!page_mapped_in_vma(page, vma))
>  				continue;
> -			if (vma->vm_mm == tsk->mm)
> -				add_to_kill(tsk, page, vma, to_kill, tkc);
> +			if (vma->vm_mm == t->mm)
> +				add_to_kill(t, page, vma, to_kill, tkc);
>  		}
>  	}
>  	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> @@ -440,10 +470,10 @@ static void collect_procs_file(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
>  	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
>  	for_each_process(tsk) {
>  		pgoff_t pgoff = page->index << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT);
> +		struct task_struct *t = task_early_kill(tsk, force_early);
>  
> -		if (!task_early_kill(tsk, force_early))
> +		if (!t)
>  			continue;
> -
>  		vma_interval_tree_foreach(vma, &mapping->i_mmap, pgoff,
>  				      pgoff) {
>  			/*
> @@ -453,8 +483,8 @@ static void collect_procs_file(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
>  			 * Assume applications who requested early kill want
>  			 * to be informed of all such data corruptions.
>  			 */
> -			if (vma->vm_mm == tsk->mm)
> -				add_to_kill(tsk, page, vma, to_kill, tkc);
> +			if (vma->vm_mm == t->mm)
> +				add_to_kill(t, page, vma, to_kill, tkc);
>  		}
>  	}
>  	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]