On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 05:12:51PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> And why can't it be a real use case?
You mean there's someone out there running SMP=n kernels on current
hardware which has CPPC too? Yeah, right.
> The honest answer is that we don't know.
>
> Moreover, AFAICS the requisite #ifdeffery is there already and the
> problem is that the init_freq_invariance_cppc() defined in smpboot.c
> is not exported to modules and the CPPC code is modular in this build.
Yah, I saw that. And that's why I'm saying CPPC should depend on SMP -
because it needs that functionality which is defined there.
But if you really wanna support SMP=n, I don't care that much to debate
this more - I just think it is silly.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
