On Tue 21-12-21 20:23:34, Alexey Makhalov wrote:
>
>
> > On Dec 21, 2021, at 1:46 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue 21-12-21 05:46:16, Alexey Makhalov wrote:
> >> Hi Michal,
> >>
> >> The patchset looks good to me. I didn’t find any issues during the testing.
> >
> > Thanks a lot. Can I add your Tested-by: tag?
> Sure, thanks.
Thanks I will add those then.
> >> I have one concern regarding dmesg output. Do you think this messaging is
> >> valid if possible node is not yet present?
> >> Or is it only the issue for virtual machines?
> >>
> >> Node XX uninitialized by the platform. Please report with boot dmesg.
> >> Initmem setup node XX [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000000]
> >
> > AFAIU the Initmem part of the output is what concerns you, right? Yeah,
> First line actually, this sentence “Please report with boot dmesg.”. But
> there is nothing to fix, at least for VMs.
I am still not sure because at least x86 aims at handling that at the
platform code. David has given us a way to trigger this from kvm/qemu so
I will play with that. I can certainly change the wording but this whole
thing was meant to do a fixup after the arch specific code has initialized
everything.
> > that really is more cryptic than necessary. Does this look any better?
> > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > index 34743dcd2d66..7e18a924be7e 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -7618,9 +7618,14 @@ static void __init free_area_init_node(int nid)
> > pgdat->node_start_pfn = start_pfn;
> > pgdat->per_cpu_nodestats = NULL;
> >
> > - pr_info("Initmem setup node %d [mem %#018Lx-%#018Lx]\n", nid,
> > - (u64)start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
> > - end_pfn ? ((u64)end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1 : 0);
> > + if (start_pfn != end_pfn) {
> > + pr_info("Initmem setup node %d [mem %#018Lx-%#018Lx]\n", nid,
> > + (u64)start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
> > + end_pfn ? ((u64)end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1 : 0);
> > + } else {
> > + pr_info("Initmem setup node %d as memoryless\n", nid);
> > + }
> > +
> > calculate_node_totalpages(pgdat, start_pfn, end_pfn);
> >
> > alloc_node_mem_map(pgdat);
> Second line looks much better.
OK, I will fold that in. I think it is more descriptive as well.
>
> Thank you,
> —Alexey
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
