Hi! On 20/12/2021 12:28, Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> I however run the above patch because of the reasons described in the commit message. >> Nevertheless, the bug fixed now remains a bug no matter what triggers it. > I'm not yet convinced that this is the best way to fix it. Should we update > the erase mask to cover this case? Well, let's wait until the maintainers form their opinion. I've listed the functions which zero the size (spi_nor_parse_4bait() or spi_nor_init_non_uniform_erase_map()), there are already functions which check for zero: spi_nor_select_uniform_erase() spi_nor_select_erase() -- Best regards, Alexander Sverdlin.
