Re: [PATCH] usb: cdnsp: Fix incorrect status for control request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21-12-09 12:57:31, Pawel Laszczak wrote:
> >> From: Pawel Laszczak <pawell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Patch fixes incorrect status for control request.
> >> Without this fix all usb_request objects were returned to upper drivers
> >> with usb_reqest->status field set to -EINPROGRESS.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 3d82904559f4 ("usb: cdnsp: cdns3 Add main part of Cadence USBSSP DRD Driver")
> >> Reported-by: Ken (Jian) He <jianhe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Pawel Laszczak <pawell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/usb/cdns3/cdnsp-ring.c | 2 ++
> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/cdns3/cdnsp-ring.c b/drivers/usb/cdns3/cdnsp-ring.c
> >> index 1b1438457fb0..e8f5ecbb5c75 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/usb/cdns3/cdnsp-ring.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/cdns3/cdnsp-ring.c
> >> @@ -1029,6 +1029,8 @@ static void cdnsp_process_ctrl_td(struct cdnsp_device *pdev,
> >>  		return;
> >>  	}
> >>
> >> +	*status = 0;
> >> +
> >>  	cdnsp_finish_td(pdev, td, event, pep, status);
> >>  }
> >>
> >> --
> >I think you may move *status = 0 at the beginning of
> >cdnsp_process_ctrl_td in case you would like to handle some error
> >conditions during this function.
> 
> I don't predict any other status code for control request in this place.
> I wanted to set this status only once after completion status stage. It was the reason why I put this
> statement at the end of function.

So, you always consider there is no error for control request handling?

-- 

Thanks,
Peter Chen




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux