From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
commit 444dd878e85fb33fcfb2682cfdab4c236f33ea3e upstream.
The kerneldoc comment of pm_runtime_active() does not reflect the
behavior of the function, so update it accordingly.
Fixes: 403d2d116ec0 ("PM: runtime: Add kerneldoc comments to multiple helpers")
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/pm_runtime.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/include/linux/pm_runtime.h
+++ b/include/linux/pm_runtime.h
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static inline bool pm_runtime_suspended(
* pm_runtime_active - Check whether or not a device is runtime-active.
* @dev: Target device.
*
- * Return %true if runtime PM is enabled for @dev and its runtime PM status is
+ * Return %true if runtime PM is disabled for @dev or its runtime PM status is
* %RPM_ACTIVE, or %false otherwise.
*
* Note that the return value of this function can only be trusted if it is
