On 2021-12-10 9:35 a.m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 09:14:30AM -0500, James Zhu wrote:
On 2021-12-10 8:33 a.m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 05:09:56PM -0500, James Zhu wrote:
From: Yifan Zhang <yifan1.zhang@xxxxxxx>
commit afd18180c07026f94a80ff024acef5f4159084a4 upstream.
When IOMMU disabled in sbios and kfd in iommuv2 path, iommuv2
init will fail. But this failure should not block amdgpu driver init.
Reported-by: youling <youling257@xxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: youling <youling257@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Yifan Zhang <yifan1.zhang@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: James Zhu <James.Zhu@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: James Zhu <James.Zhu@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 4 ----
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device.c | 3 +++
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
index 488e574f5da1..f262c4e7a48a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
@@ -2255,10 +2255,6 @@ static int amdgpu_device_ip_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
amdgpu_xgmi_add_device(adev);
amdgpu_amdkfd_device_init(adev);
- r = amdgpu_amdkfd_resume_iommu(adev);
- if (r)
- goto init_failed;
-
amdgpu_fru_get_product_info(adev);
init_failed:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device.c
index 1204dae85797..b35f0af71f00 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device.c
@@ -751,6 +751,9 @@ bool kgd2kfd_device_init(struct kfd_dev *kfd,
kfd_cwsr_init(kfd);
+ if (kgd2kfd_resume_iommu(kfd))
+ goto device_iommu_error;
+
if (kfd_resume(kfd))
goto kfd_resume_error;
--
2.25.1
Like I said last time, do not change the backport unless you HAVE to.
You did it here again for no good reason :(
[JZ] Yes, I should add more explanation next time.
Backport conflict fix to remove svm_migrate_init((struct amdgpu_device
*)kfd->kgd);
new AMD svm feature has not been added for 5.10 So it is safe to remove it.
No, I am talking about the fact that you fixed up a coding style fix in
this backport that is not in the original commit in Linus's tree.
[JZ] I see. this fix is not necessary. Do you want me to send v2 with
this unnecessary coding style fix dropping for backport?
