The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From 473441720c8616dfaf4451f9c7ea14f0eb5e5d65 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 14:05:18 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] fuse: release pipe buf after last use
Checking buf->flags should be done before the pipe_buf_release() is called
on the pipe buffer, since releasing the buffer might modify the flags.
This is exactly what page_cache_pipe_buf_release() does, and which results
in the same VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageLRU(page)) that the original patch was
trying to fix.
Reported-by: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 712a951025c0 ("fuse: fix page stealing")
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v2.6.35
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
index 79f7eda49e06..cd54a529460d 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
@@ -847,17 +847,17 @@ static int fuse_try_move_page(struct fuse_copy_state *cs, struct page **pagep)
replace_page_cache_page(oldpage, newpage);
+ get_page(newpage);
+
+ if (!(buf->flags & PIPE_BUF_FLAG_LRU))
+ lru_cache_add(newpage);
+
/*
* Release while we have extra ref on stolen page. Otherwise
* anon_pipe_buf_release() might think the page can be reused.
*/
pipe_buf_release(cs->pipe, buf);
- get_page(newpage);
-
- if (!(buf->flags & PIPE_BUF_FLAG_LRU))
- lru_cache_add(newpage);
-
err = 0;
spin_lock(&cs->req->waitq.lock);
if (test_bit(FR_ABORTED, &cs->req->flags))
