From: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> commit 2226667a145db2e1f314d7f57fd644fe69863ab9 upstream. It appears that some devices are lying about their mask capability, pretending that they don't have it, while they actually do. The net result is that now that we don't enable MSIs on such endpoint. Add a new per-device flag to deal with this. Further patches will make use of it, sadly. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211104180130.3825416-2-maz@xxxxxxxxxx Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/pci/msi.c | 3 +++ include/linux/pci.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+) --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c @@ -569,6 +569,9 @@ msi_setup_entry(struct pci_dev *dev, int goto out; pci_read_config_word(dev, dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_FLAGS, &control); + /* Lies, damned lies, and MSIs */ + if (dev->dev_flags & PCI_DEV_FLAGS_HAS_MSI_MASKING) + control |= PCI_MSI_FLAGS_MASKBIT; entry->msi_attrib.is_msix = 0; entry->msi_attrib.is_64 = !!(control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT); --- a/include/linux/pci.h +++ b/include/linux/pci.h @@ -205,6 +205,8 @@ enum pci_dev_flags { PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_FLR_RESET = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 << 10), /* Don't use Relaxed Ordering for TLPs directed at this device */ PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 << 11), + /* Device does honor MSI masking despite saying otherwise */ + PCI_DEV_FLAGS_HAS_MSI_MASKING = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 << 12), }; enum pci_irq_reroute_variant {
