On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 06:02:50PM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote: > This implementation is very similar to stack_trace_save_tsk(), maybe we > can just move stack_trace_save_tsk() out of CONFIG_STACKTRACE and reuse > it. No, we want to move away from the stack_trace_*() API because it has very unclear semantics and various arch implementations differ in details. There's a patch that untangles arch_stack_walk*() from CONFIG_STACKTRACE and we can eventually use that.
