On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 10:26:31PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 11/17/21 4:16 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 03:50:17PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > Sorry for top-posting and quoting this all, but the actual people > > > involved with the wchan changes don't seem to be on the participant > > > list. > > > > Adding more folks from a private report and > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215031 > > > > and for the new people, here's a lore link for this thread: > > https://lore.kernel.org/stable/YZV02RCRVHIa144u@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > > > FWIW, earlier bisection pointed to the stable backport of > > 5d1ceb3969b6b2e47e2df6d17790a7c5a20fcbb4 being the primary culprit. > > At first glance it seems to me that the problem with -stable is that an > > unvetted subset of the wchan refactoring series landed in -stable. > > > > Can the (partial) wchan backport possibly be dropped from v5.15.y until > someone figures out what exactly - if anything - is needed ? Now dropped.
