On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 09:57:55PM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 10:00 AM Naresh Kamboju > <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 22:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.160 release. > > > There are 355 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > let me know. > > > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Nov 2021 16:52:23 +0000. > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.160-rc1.gz > > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > > > Perf build broken due to following errors. > > > > > Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > libbpf: Fix BTF data layout checks and allow empty BTF > > > > > > In file included from btf.c:17: > > btf.c: In function 'btf_parse_hdr': > > btf.c:104:62: error: 'struct btf' has no member named 'raw_size'; did > > you mean 'data_size'? > > 104 | pr_debug("Invalid BTF total size:%u\n", btf->raw_size); > > | ^~~~~~~~ > > > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Build log: > > https://builds.tuxbuild.com/20xsgAxLwf4E60xl2dTdXnNS8FZ/ > > Greg, > > c733c19fda7b ("libbpf: Fix BTF data layout checks and allow empty > BTF") should either be dropped, or fixed like the below: > > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c > index 3380aadb7465..41daf0fa95b9 100644 > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c > @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static int btf_parse_hdr(struct btf *btf) > } > > if (meta_left < hdr->str_off + hdr->str_len) { > - pr_debug("Invalid BTF total size:%u\n", btf->raw_size); > + pr_debug("Invalid BTF total size:%u\n", btf->data_size); > return -EINVAL; > } > > Not sure which one you'd prefer. Both will fix perf build. I'll go fix it up, thanks. greg k-h
