From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 2507003a1d10917c9158077bf6030719d02c941e ]
lock_is_held_type(, 1) detects acquired read locks. It only recognized
locks acquired with lock_acquire_shared(). Read locks acquired with
lock_acquire_shared_recursive() are not recognized because a `2' is
stored as the read value.
Rework the check to additionally recognise lock's read value one and two
as a read held lock.
Fixes: e918188611f07 ("locking: More accurate annotations for read_lock()")
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210903084001.lblecrvz4esl4mrr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 8a509672a4cc9..d624231eab2bb 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -5366,7 +5366,7 @@ int __lock_is_held(const struct lockdep_map *lock, int read)
struct held_lock *hlock = curr->held_locks + i;
if (match_held_lock(hlock, lock)) {
- if (read == -1 || hlock->read == read)
+ if (read == -1 || !!hlock->read == read)
return LOCK_STATE_HELD;
return LOCK_STATE_NOT_HELD;
--
2.33.0
