RE: [PATCH V2] x86/sgx: Fix free page accounting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>> The consequence of sgx_nr_free_pages not being protected is that
>>> its value may not accurately reflect the actual number of free
>>> pages on the system, impacting the availability of free pages in
>>> support of many flows. The problematic scenario isu when the
>> 
> > In non-atomicity is not a problem, when it is not a problem :-)

This is most definitely a problem.

start with sgx_nr_free_pages == 100

Now have a cpu on node0 allocate a page at the same time as another
cpu on node1 allcoates a page. Each holds the relevent per-node lock,
but that doesn't stop both CPUs from accessing the global together:

	CPU on node0		CPU on node1
	sgx_nr_free_pages--;		sgx_nr_free_pages--;

What is the value of sgx_nr_free_pages now? We want it to be 98,
but it could be 99.

Rinse, repeat thousands of times. Eventually the value of sgx_nr_free_pages
has not even a close connection to the number of free pages.

-Tony






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux