On Sat, Nov 6, 2021 at 9:45 PM Anup Patel <anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 3:18 PM <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > When using "devm_request_threaded_irq(,,,,IRQF_ONESHOT,,)" in the driver, > > only the first interrupt could be handled, and continue irq is blocked by > > hw. Because the riscv plic couldn't complete masked irq source which has > > been disabled in enable register. The bug was firstly reported in [1]. > > > > Here is the description of Interrupt Completion in PLIC spec [2]: > > > > The PLIC signals it has completed executing an interrupt handler by > > writing the interrupt ID it received from the claim to the claim/complete > > register. The PLIC does not check whether the completion ID is the same > > as the last claim ID for that target. If the completion ID does not match > > an interrupt source that is currently enabled for the target, the > > ^^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^ > > completion is silently ignored. > > > > [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/2021-July/007441.html > > [2] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-plic-spec/blob/8bc15a35d07c9edf7b5d23fec9728302595ffc4d/riscv-plic.adoc > > > > Fixes: bb0fed1c60cc ("irqchip/sifive-plic: Switch to fasteoi flow") > > Reported-by: Vincent Pelletier <plr.vincent@xxxxxxxxx> > > Tested-by: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Looks good to me. > > Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thx @Marc Zyngier Could you help to take the patch into your tree include "Anup's Reviewed-by"? Or Let me update a new version of the patch. > > Regards, > Anup > > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: Anup Patel <anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Atish Patra <atish.patra@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: incent Pelletier <plr.vincent@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > Changes since V7: > > - Add Fixes tag > > - Add Tested-by > > - Add Cc stable > > > > Changes since V6: > > - Propagate to plic_irq_eoi for all riscv,plic by Nikita Shubin > > - Remove thead related codes > > > > Changes since V5: > > - Move back to mask/unmask > > - Fixup the problem in eoi callback > > - Remove allwinner,sun20i-d1 IRQCHIP_DECLARE > > - Rewrite comment log > > > > Changes since V4: > > - Update comment by Anup > > > > Changes since V3: > > - Rename "c9xx" to "c900" > > - Add sifive_plic_chip and thead_plic_chip for difference > > > > Changes since V2: > > - Add a separate compatible string "thead,c9xx-plic" > > - set irq_mask/unmask of "plic_chip" to NULL and point > > irq_enable/disable of "plic_chip" to plic_irq_mask/unmask > > - Add a detailed comment block in plic_init() about the > > differences in Claim/Completion process of RISC-V PLIC and C9xx > > PLIC. > > --- > > drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c | 8 +++++++- > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c > > index cf74cfa82045..259065d271ef 100644 > > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c > > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c > > @@ -163,7 +163,13 @@ static void plic_irq_eoi(struct irq_data *d) > > { > > struct plic_handler *handler = this_cpu_ptr(&plic_handlers); > > > > - writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM); > > + if (irqd_irq_masked(d)) { > > + plic_irq_unmask(d); > > + writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM); > > + plic_irq_mask(d); > > + } else { > > + writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM); > > + } > > } > > > > static struct irq_chip plic_chip = { > > -- > > 2.25.1 > > -- Best Regards Guo Ren ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/
