Hello! On 11/4/21 8:12 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.14.17 release. There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Sat, 06 Nov 2021 14:11:51 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late. The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.14.17-rc1.gz or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.14.y and the diffstat can be found below. thanks, greg k-h
Results from Linaro's test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. ## Build * kernel: 5.14.17-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.14.y * git commit: 05ed8d6b833a25cb7b38026ed8f584dbdce21ec2 * git describe: v5.14.16-17-g05ed8d6b833a * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.14.y/build/v5.14.16-17-g05ed8d6b833a ## No regressions (compared to v5.14.16) ## No fixes (compared to v5.14.16) ## Test result summary total: 95590, pass: 80826, fail: 1113, skip: 12783, xfail: 868 ## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 290 total, 268 passed, 22 failed * arm64: 40 total, 40 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 39 total, 39 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 40 total, 40 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance Greetings! Daniel Díaz daniel.diaz@xxxxxxxxxx -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
