On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 8:51 AM Karol Herbst <kherbst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 2:11 AM Ben Skeggs <skeggsb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > The code which constructs the modules for each engine present on the GPU > > passes -1 for 'instance' on non-instanced engines, which affects how the > > name for a sub-device is generated. This is then stored as 'instance 0' > > in nvkm_subdev.inst, so code can potentially be shared with earlier GPUs > > that only had a single instance of an engine. > > > > However, GF100's CE constructor uses this value to calculate the address > > of its falcon before it's translated, resulting in CE0 getting the wrong > > address. > > > > This slightly modifies the approach, always passing a valid instance for > > engines that *can* have multiple copies, and having the code for earlier > > GPUs explicitly ask for non-instanced name generation. > > > > Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/nouveau/-/issues/91 > > > > Fixes: 50551b15c760 ("drm/nouveau/ce: switch to instanced constructor") > > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v5.12+ > > Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/ce/gt215.c | 2 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/base.c | 3 +-- > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/ce/gt215.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/ce/gt215.c > > index 704df0f2d1f1..09a112af2f89 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/ce/gt215.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/ce/gt215.c > > @@ -78,6 +78,6 @@ int > > gt215_ce_new(struct nvkm_device *device, enum nvkm_subdev_type type, int inst, > > struct nvkm_engine **pengine) > > { > > - return nvkm_falcon_new_(>215_ce, device, type, inst, > > + return nvkm_falcon_new_(>215_ce, device, type, -1, > > (device->chipset != 0xaf), 0x104000, pengine); > > } > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/base.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/base.c > > index ca75c5f6ecaf..b51d690f375f 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/base.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/base.c > > @@ -3147,8 +3147,7 @@ nvkm_device_ctor(const struct nvkm_device_func *func, > > WARN_ON(device->chip->ptr.inst & ~((1 << ARRAY_SIZE(device->ptr)) - 1)); \ > > for (j = 0; device->chip->ptr.inst && j < ARRAY_SIZE(device->ptr); j++) { \ > > if ((device->chip->ptr.inst & BIT(j)) && (subdev_mask & BIT_ULL(type))) { \ > > - int inst = (device->chip->ptr.inst == 1) ? -1 : (j); \ > > - ret = device->chip->ptr.ctor(device, (type), inst, &device->ptr[j]); \ > > + ret = device->chip->ptr.ctor(device, (type), (j), &device->ptr[j]); \ > > subdev = nvkm_device_subdev(device, (type), (j)); \ > > if (ret) { \ > > nvkm_subdev_del(&subdev); \ > > -- > > 2.31.1 > > > > Reviewed-by: Karol Herbst <kherbst@xxxxxxxxxx> Tested that on a GF108, so Tested-by: Karol Herbst <kherbst@xxxxxxxxxx>