[PATCH 5.14 131/162] drm/ttm: fix type mismatch error on sparc64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Huang Rui <ray.huang@xxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 3ca706c189db861b2ca2019a0901b94050ca49d8 ]

On sparc64, __fls() returns an "int", but the drm TTM code expected it
to be "unsigned long" as on x86.  As a result, on sparc (and arc, and
m68k) you get build errors because 'min()' checks that the types match.

As suggested by Linus, it can use min_t instead of min to force the type
to be "unsigned int".

Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
index cb38b1a17b09..82cbb29a05aa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
@@ -383,7 +383,8 @@ int ttm_pool_alloc(struct ttm_pool *pool, struct ttm_tt *tt,
 	else
 		gfp_flags |= GFP_HIGHUSER;
 
-	for (order = min(MAX_ORDER - 1UL, __fls(num_pages)); num_pages;
+	for (order = min_t(unsigned int, MAX_ORDER - 1, __fls(num_pages));
+	     num_pages;
 	     order = min_t(unsigned int, order, __fls(num_pages))) {
 		bool apply_caching = false;
 		struct ttm_pool_type *pt;
-- 
2.33.0






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux