[PATCH 5.10 17/63] perf test: Fix bpf test sample mismatch reporting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Michael Petlan <mpetlan@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 3e11300cdfd5f1bc13a05dfc6dccf69aca5dd1dc upstream.

When the expected sample count in the condition changed, the message
needs to be changed too, otherwise we'll get:

  0x1001f2091d8: mmap mask[0]:
  BPF filter result incorrect, expected 56, got 56 samples

Fixes: 4b04e0decd2518e5 ("perf test: Fix basic bpf filtering test")
Signed-off-by: Michael Petlan <mpetlan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https //lore.kernel.org/r/20210805160611.5542-1-mpetlan@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 tools/perf/tests/bpf.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static int do_test(struct bpf_object *ob
 	}
 
 	if (count != expect * evlist->core.nr_entries) {
-		pr_debug("BPF filter result incorrect, expected %d, got %d samples\n", expect, count);
+		pr_debug("BPF filter result incorrect, expected %d, got %d samples\n", expect * evlist->core.nr_entries, count);
 		goto out_delete_evlist;
 	}
 





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux