On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 05:03:33PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Wednesday 22 September 2021 16:41:30 Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 06:46:43PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > On Wednesday 15 September 2021 16:30:03 gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > The patch below does not apply to the 5.14-stable tree. > > > > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm > > > > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit > > > > id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>. > > > > > > Hello that patch depends on commit which fixes name of rootcap member: > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=e902bb7c24a7099d0eb0eb4cba06f2d91e9299f3 > > > > Thanks, that worked for 5.10 and 5.14, but not for 5.4.y. If this needs > > to go there too, can you send a working set of backported patches? > > Hello Greg! > > Applying patches in this order passes: > > git cherry-pick e0d9d30b73548fbfe5c024ed630169bdc9a08aee > git cherry-pick b1bd5714472cc72e14409f5659b154c765a76c65 > git cherry-pick e902bb7c24a7099d0eb0eb4cba06f2d91e9299f3 > git cherry-pick 43f5c77bcbd27cce70bf33c2b86d6726ce95dd66 > > First patch fixes big endian support in driver code and second patch > fixes filling return value of function call on error (return value is > passed via pointer argument). I do not know why they do not have > appropriate Fixes tag, but for me it looks like that both patches are > suitable for stable backporting. > > What do you think, are first two patches suitable for backport? Or do > you need some other solution? Looks good to me, thanks for these, all now queued up! greg k-h
