On Tue, Sep 21 2021 at 15:20, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:31:08AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: >>On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 05:46:57PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>>On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 09:29:32PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >>>> >>>>I guess I was not able to express myself correctly. What I wanted to say >>>>is: >>>> >>>> 1) Default is AUTOSEL >>>> >>>> 2) Maintainer can take files/subsystems out of AUTOSEL completely >>>> >>>> Exists today >>>> >>>> 3) Maintainer allows AUTOSEL, but anything picked from files/subsystems >>>> without a stable tag requires an explicit ACK from the maintainer >>>> for the backport. >>>> >>>> Is new and I would be the first to opt-in :) >>>> >>>>My rationale for #3 is that even when being careful about stable tags, >>>>it happens that one is missing. Occasionaly AUTOSEL finds one of those >>>>in my subsystems which I appreciate. >>>> >>>>Does that make more sense now? >>> >>>Ah, yes, that makes much more sense, sorry for the confusion. >>> >>>Sasha, what do you think? You are the one that scripts all of this, not >>>me :) >> >>I could give it a go. It adds some complexity here but is probably worth >>it to avoid issues. >> >>Let me think about the best way to go about it. > > So I'm thinking of yet another patch series that would go out, but > instead of AUTOSEL it'll be tagged with "MANUALSEL". It would work the > exact same way as AUTOSEL, without the final step of queueing up the > commits into the stable trees. > > Thomas, do you want to give it a go? Want to describe how I filter for > commits you'd be taking care of? In the past I'd grep a combo of paths > and committers (i.e. net/ && davem@), but you have your hands in too > many things :) Indeed. :( So pretty much all what matches in MAINTAINERS entries where my name happened to end up for some reasons. That would be a good start. Might be a bit overbroad as it also includes x86/kvm, x86/xen, x86/pci which I'm not that involved with, but to make it simple for you, I just volunteered the relevant maintainers (CCed) to participate in that experiment. :) Thanks, tglx