On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 12:10 PM Nick Desaulniers
<ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Isn't the parameter `blksize` of `nbd_set_size` declared as `loff_t`?
So?
I'm not seeing your point.
We've checked the range of it - in loff_t.
So the *value* is already checked, and most definitely fits in 'unsigned long'.
So __ffs() is perfectly fine. It will truncate that loff_t to a sane type.
What is the problem you're trying to solve?
Linus
