On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 8:06 AM Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 21-09-14 09:57:49, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Sep 2021 09:56:23 +0100 > > Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 13 Sep 2021 18:33:17 -0400 > > > Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > From: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > [ Upstream commit 5161a55c069f53d88da49274cbef6e3c74eadea9 ] > > > > > > > > CXL core is growing, and it's already arguably unmanageable. To support > > > > future growth, move core functionality to a new directory and rename the > > > > file to represent just bus support. Future work will remove non-bus > > > > functionality. > > > > > > > > Note that mem.h is renamed to cxlmem.h to avoid a namespace collision > > > > with the global ARCH=um mem.h header. > > > > > > Not a fix... > > > > > > I'm guessing this got picked up on the basis of the Reported-by: tag? > > > I think that was added for a minor tweak as this went through review rather > > > than referring to the whole patch. > > Or possibly because it was a precursor to the fix in the next patch. > > > > Hmm. Ben, Dan, does it make sense for these two to go into stable? > > > > Jonathan > > As of now, no, but having this will make future fixes much easier to cherry > pick. Sasha, please drop this. The CXL subsystem is still in major feature development. I would rather manually backport small fixes rather than backport major code movement just to make small fix backport easier. Let me know if there was a specific fix autosel was trying to resolve and we'll take a look at whether it makes sense to do a custom backport for -stable.
