Re: [bug report] nvme0n1 node still exists after blktests nvme-tcp/014 on 5.13.16-rc1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [bug report] nvme0n1 node still exists after blktests nvme-tcp/014 on 5.13.16-rc1
From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 17:28:19 +0300
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAHj4cs94pDUfSSfij=ENQxL-2PaGrHJSnhn_mHTC+hqSvPzBTQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0

Hello
I found this failure on stable 5.13.16-rc1[1] and cannot reproduce it
on 5.14, seems we are missing commit[2] on 5.13.y, could anyone help
check it?


Was it picked up and didn't apply correctly?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [bug report] nvme0n1 node still exists after blktests nvme-tcp/014 on 5.13.16-rc1
  - From: Yi Zhang

References:
- [bug report] nvme0n1 node still exists after blktests nvme-tcp/014 on 5.13.16-rc1
  - From: Yi Zhang

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau/ga102-: support ttm buffer moves via copy engine
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.14 03/25] cxl: Move cxl_core to new directory
Previous by thread: [bug report] nvme0n1 node still exists after blktests nvme-tcp/014 on 5.13.16-rc1
Next by thread: Re: [bug report] nvme0n1 node still exists after blktests nvme-tcp/014 on 5.13.16-rc1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Development Newbies] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Hiking] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux