From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit e183bf31cf0d3a05162e633e428350ed176ce926 ]
The manual has always said that we need 100 us delays in a few
places. Though it hasn't seemed to be a big deal to skip these, let's
add them in case it makes something happier.
NOTE: this fixes no known issues but it seems good to make it right.
Fixes: a095f15c00e2 ("drm/bridge: add support for sn65dsi86 bridge driver")
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210730084534.v2.3.I842d483139531aa4651da8338512fdf0171ff23c@changeid
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
index ecd4fa3a9a1d..c9cddf317c72 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
@@ -304,6 +304,9 @@ static int __maybe_unused ti_sn65dsi86_resume(struct device *dev)
return ret;
}
+ /* td2: min 100 us after regulators before enabling the GPIO */
+ usleep_range(100, 110);
+
gpiod_set_value(pdata->enable_gpio, 1);
/*
@@ -886,6 +889,9 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
if (!pdata->refclk)
ti_sn65dsi86_enable_comms(pdata);
+
+ /* td7: min 100 us after enable before DSI data */
+ usleep_range(100, 110);
}
static void ti_sn_bridge_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
--
2.30.2
