On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 07:35:57PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 03:35:02PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:09:58PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote: > >> >> From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> > >> >> Fixes an easy DoS and possible information disclosure. > >> >> > >> >> This does nothing about the broken state of x32 auditing. > >> >> > >> >> eparis: If the admin has enabled auditd and has specifically loaded audit > >> >> rules. This bug has been around since before git. Wow... > >> >> > >> >> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> --- > >> >> kernel/auditsc.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++--------- > >> >> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > >> > > >> > Did this patch get dropped somewhere? Isn't it a valid bugfix, or did I > >> > miss a later conversation about this? > >> > >> Hmm. It seems that it didn't make it into Linus' tree. Crap. > >> > >> IMO we need some kind of real tracking system for issues reported to > >> security@. > > > > That seems to be my mbox at times :) > > > > But yes, having something "real" might be good if the load gets higher, > > right now it's so low that my "sweep pending security patches" task > > usually catches anything pending, which is rare. > > How does one get added to the security@ alias? We've been carrying > this patch in Fedora for a bit now. I'd be happy to help track things > given we get distro security bug reports and such. Just ask on the security@ alias to be added and we can take it from there. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html